Posted by
Rajjpuut's Folly on Thursday, September 10, 2009 11:19:29 PM
Should Ritalin be reclassified as a long-term POISON? YES!
If just one step to improve health care can be done: eliminate the FDA.
FDA Fouls up on Ritalin; Won’t Admit Error
Ritalin Does NOT Work, Creates Big Health Problems
and thanks to FDA Still on the Market
Remember that in this anti-FDA series . . . with the strong likelihood of a new and expensive health care program being created this summer, a program which is NOT calling for the complete scrap-heaping and re-organization of the FDA, Rajjpuut has boldly stated that if only one step to improve health care could be done: the only one that should be considered first is eliminating the FDA.
Criticized recently for raving against pharmaceutical companies creating “long term subscribers to their dangerous, expensive and unnecessary concoctions that do not cure anything, and only mask symptoms,” Rajjpuut was asked, “Surely you exaggerate to make your point?” Not one iota. The groups that are exaggerating are the FDA and the huge pharmaceutical companies. Here’s the most famous recent time their exaggerations caught up to them . . . in Great Britain, but not apparently in this country, yet.
If you’ve read his blogs for anytime at all, you may be aware that as a boy Rajjpuut would clearly have been descrived as the typically diagnosed child today with so-called ADHD (Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder) look like a geriatric with sleeping sickness. So the diagnosis surely would have been: Rajjpuut the ADHD child. Rajjpuut actually learned to focus and concentrate as a boy playing chess from the age of eleven on and the problem disappeared gradually at first and then quickly once he reached high school. There are perhaps a good ten thousand outlets like chess that’ll do the trick (kung fu; archery; etc., etc., . . .) no big deal. However, the FDA exaggerated the safety and allowed Novartis to greatly exaggerate the benefits of Ritalin which is now under fire in the United Kingdom . . . and that's the only proper way to control ADHD according to the FDA.
So let’s look at this more closely: does Ritalin cure anything? NO!
Does Ritalin mask symptoms? YES!
Is Ritalin prescribed for long-term use? YES!
Does Ritalin have side effects we should be aware of? YES!
Is Ritalin expensive? YES!
Should this drug Ritalin be reclassified as a POISON? YES!
So Ritalin qualifies on every count, (or from the FDA viewpoint: Ritalin should have been DISqualified on every point!) and Novartis fits perfectly in the niche as a big pharmaceutical company creating “long term subscribers to their dangerous, expensive and unnecessary concoctions that do not cure anything, and only mask symptoms.” In fact I’d heard that there were ongoing class action suits against Novartis, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) and CHAD (Children and Adults with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder) for colluding to dramatically increase the number of incidences of patients being diagnosed with this disease. In seventeen years the number of referrals with this diagnosis has risen 3000 percent. Thus if one child in a huge 3rd grade class were ADHD in 1992, today all but one child in that class would have such a diagnosis (imagine the joy of teaching the little zombies!) and in all cases they would be told that “Ritalin is the drug of choice.”
So the psychiatric definition has been so significantly altered that virtually any child with any energy in America is considered a very likely ADHD kid . . . how’s that for corrupt? Remember again, that Rajjpuut’s favorite kicking boy, the FDA is the one that down-played any evil side-effects of Ritalin and its imitators and that agreed with Novartis that the benefits were great. Well let’s fast forward to recent times when, as they always do the FDA chickens have come home to roost and it looks like Ritalin is about as dangerous as they come but like so many other instances of FDA incompetence, the drug is NOT recalled, they just add a bigger sized set of warnings on the packaging and inside the box. How bad is it, you ask?
A. Recent studies indicate first of all, there is absolutely NO beneficial long-term effect. In fact, the studies indicate that the initial short-term benefits were deliberately exaggerated. NICE!
B. Studies also indicate long-term usage brings about significant damage to the cardiovascular system: patients get CV disorders, sometimes have heart attacks and strokes (much more likely in adults taking Ritalin, but even children can suffer from this problem).
C. Studies also indicate long-term usage brings about behavioral problems like increased aggression, moodiness, anorexia, depression and suicidal thoughts, etc.
D. Studies also indicate long-term usage brings about stunting of growth in both height and weight and may postpone puberty.
E. Studies also indicate long-term usage brings about very powerful symptoms like: “hearing voices,” “acute paranoia,” sudden death from CV problems and suicide attempts.
F. Recent studies indicate, you’ll remember: absolutely NO long-term beneficial effect and that any short-term benefits were deliberately exaggerated!
Rajjpuut would like to ask his detractors and any thinking person to carefully re-read the six paragraphs immediately above this one and ask himself: A. What benefits ever came from this drug? B. What harm came from this drug? C. Who besides Novartis and the FDA benefits from it being initially approved and NOW kept on the market instead of being removed from circulation? (The FDA doesn’t look so bad, if all that’s necessary is to add a firmer warning).
The premise of this and all the rants against the FDA are that it is the single most corrupt and harmful government source of health care problems and NO health care program now or later can succeed without complete elimination or revamping of this “Evil Empire.”
Ya’ll live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut